I used to have a website where I posted my doodles for a few months:
http://actualdoodles.blogspot.com/
All the sketches I've done in the last year or so actually has to be kept private.
I think you and I are still friends on DeviantArt. It's a weird website, I really don't like it much.
To be honest, I have to agree with you, but then again that's mostly my fault for adding in the Pokémon boards. Hopefully in the mean time we'll find ways to shorten sections or make them more accessible to people's liking.
I wouldn't say that. Bigger issues would be the fact that general discussion has 3 sub forums, and that each console has subforums for specific zelda games.
If you're not already familiar with the movie, then I should give you fair warning: it's pornography.
I mean, it's a brilliant film with a fairly historically accurate portrayal. But the historical Caligula was an insane bastard, well known for his sexual depravity. For almost the entire length of the film, there are naked bodies on screen. There are multiple sex scenes which actually show penises going into vaginas and mouths. All of it serves the greater purpose of the film (well, almost all of it), but you should know it's there before you sit down to watch it with your friends or something. =P
I haven't played it at all. I only watched my girlfriend play up through the first dungeon. She really really hated the controls, but I can't really speak from personal experience on that point.
What I can say is that the visual style of the game was ugly, like they were trying to do Wind Waker without cell shading. There were WAYYYY too many cutscenes that interrupted the action. (Which has been a problem since Wind Waker, so that's nothing new), and Zelda, as a character, was just an anime cliche. She's the protagonist's childhood best friend. They both have grown to like each other romantically, but they're not sure how to express their affection for one another. It's a tired cliche, and they didn't even spice it up with any interesting take on the characters or their relationships.
I can't pass judgement on the game, I haven't played the game. But what I've seen makes me feel like I never, ever want to play the game.
OHHHH, it's a walkthrough. I thought it was a speedrun.
The actual steps to completing the game are really simple. I'm not surprised it takes less than 5 minutes to explain it.
Hah! I actually laughed out loud when you got home to find you didn't have an SNES.
But wait...did Mexico have a gold cart LttP? I didn't know such a thing existed.
I actually do have access to the console and game. I own 3 NES, all of which I replaced the 42 pin connectors on. I've also got a copy of AoL, although I don't recall how well it works.
I'd be fine giving the game a serious chance, though I don't really give myself a lot of time for video games these days, and I've never really thought AoL was very fun to play. So I'd need a reason to set aside time to play it.
As for writing a walkthrough, it's kind of a long story. Basically, I was a huge fan of all the numerous Zelda fan sites that were all over the place in the early 2000s. I very much wanted to participate. So at one point I saw a website called "Zelda Cubed" that was hiring a walkthrough writer. I took the job, and was tasked with writing walkthroughs for all the zelda games. I decided to do AoL first, because I thought it was an underrepresented game in the Zelda community. But since I'd never played it, I went to GameFAQs and found someone else's walkthrough to serve as a guide for my own.
After doing some actual professional writing work, I've learned that this kind of thing is pretty normal and expected of working writers. But at the time, I thought what I was doing was pretty shady. The document I ended up writing was 100% my own work, filled with a lot of dumb jokes, unnecessary parenthetical statements, and poor phrasing. I just had no way of ensuring that my walkthrough was correct, since I was relying on the work of someone else who had actually played the game. (At least I assume they did). Truth be told, I really don't like doing that sort of thing. I've so far avoided it in my writing career, but I also don't make a living wage as a writer, so maybe I've got too much pride. =P
As an addendum to the story, I was actually the only active staff member of Zelda Cubed, aside from the webmaster himself. Eventually, he set up a forum for his website. I wasn't allowed on forums, but I decided to join anyway, and he made me a moderator of the forum.
That forum was actually a sub-forum of another forum, called "The Sacred Realm." And that's how I ended up on TSR in the first place.
For me it's all about the title theme:
I played it pretty much the same way when I was a kid. Wandering around, getting in battles, occasionally the fights were too tough and I died, and eventually I'd get bored. It wasn't until I was an adult that I actually made any kind of progress at all in the game.
I think the best part of the game is actually the dungeons. You really have to make your own maps to be successful at them, and the layout of the game was so blocky that you could easily use graph paper to make your maps by filling in the squares with walls in them.
Making your own maps is the kind of thing that we don't really get to do in video games anymore. And DW made it so easy that it actually ended up being really fun.
I've always been obsessive about saving everything.
Unfortunately I have so many things saved, that it's sometimes difficult to find a specific thing that I'm looking for. Also, it has become harder to save things as more online activity becomes browser-based.
But yeah. I've got tons of voice clips from back then.
Cool beans, I'm interested to see what you come up with.
I still have the "This is Kaynil, annoying you again!" .WAV file that you made back in ~2002.
Nice to meet you.
Though I've generally decided that Twitter isn't really useful for me. I spend most of my social media time on google+. I'm +Beloch Shrike there.
I would add, to my previous comment, that if there's a "Winner," that means someone has to pick the winner.
Whoever picks the winner can't really pick themselves. If they do, it looks like / makes them feel like they're being unfair to the others.
Which means that whoever ends up being pegged as the Judge will be less motivated to contribute to the contest. Which is bad, because in a small community like this, we want as many people as possible to be motivated to participate in any group projects.
:'( *grabs his N64 and runs away into the neighbouring field*
Don't get me wrong. I like the N64. I have no personal problem with the controller. But the controller was poorly designed. When people look at any other controller, they can instantly see exactly how it works. When people look at an N64 controller for the first time, they're just confused.
Perhaps the controller's design might have been justified if you ever actually needed to use the left handle. But aside from a handful of games no one cared about, that didn't really happen.
Yesterday I watched Caligula for the first time. Damn.
I expected this movie to be a hidden gem, but I didn't expect it to be as good as it is. It's beautiful, from start to finish. The sets were amazing, the narrative was surprisingly faithful to the historical accounts. Studying Roman history is a bit of a passion of mine, particularly the period of the late republic, through the crisis of the 3rd century. There was a lot of historical tidbits present in the movie, but left largely unexplained. (Particularly the auger of the raven in Caligula's bed). It felt good to be rewarded for my knowledge by having a movie present the events without a lot of extra explanatory text. Also, god damned Malcom McDowell. I think I prefer his performance here to the one in A Clockwork Orange.
Is it weird that young Malcom McDowell did two movies where he played the most utterly despicable human being imaginable, then forces the audience to sympathize with him? That seems like a really specific niche to get typecast in.
I'm surprised to say that my one complaint is that there was too much sex. It's some of the most well-shot sex I've ever seen, but a few of those scenes were gratuitous. In particular the scene where Julia Drusilla is conceived. Up until that point, Drusilla and Caesonia hate each other. Then they start making out with each other. Then it cuts to a pair of lesbians who are spying on the royal family and having sex with each other.
What?
Apparently this scene was inserted after the fact by Penthouse, who pushed the movie into a more pornographic direction. To the point where the director took his name off of the production, which is too bad. A debauched conception scene would be appropriate, but that scene was weird to me.
Also, the whole scene where Caligula sneaks into the women-only gathering of the priestesses of Isis. Why do the priestesses of Isis have an orgy when they meet? It felt like a locker room or slumber party sex fantasy, rather than a coherent part of the narrative. Having the Isis ceremony be more austere would have served as a good counterpoint to the depravity of the rest of the movie. I don't know if this scene was also against the wishes of the director, but I don't think so.
The highlight of the movie by far is Drusilla's death scene. It stands out to me as the single most heart-wrenching loss of human life I've ever seen depicted in a film. The fact that the person the viewer experiences their grief through is Caligula himself is a testament to how well the scene was arranged. I was god damned head-in-hands weeping for his loss.
Also very good is the final scene. From Caligula getting stabbed, his daughter being bashed against the marble stairs, the baffled Claudius, and the washing away of their blood. Dayum.
A Link to the Past entered my life twice, both of which are memorable for me.
The first time was shortly after the game was released. When I was in elementary school, I met a kid named Jake Gott with whom I got along with exceptionally well. Most of the things I was into at the time were not very popular among my peers, but Jake was just as passionate about Star Wars and computers as I was. We spent a lot of time together, and one of the many things we shared was our first encounter with A Link to the Past when his parents bought it for him. He and I had spent hours playing on his SNES together, but that game stood out as different from the rest. It was on a whole different level from Contra III and Secrets of Mana.
When I was a young teenager, Ocarina of Time came out, but my parents decided the game was occultic, so I wasn't allowed to get it. But the release of OoT got me thinking about LttP again. All the fond memories I had of playing it, and how good a game it was. I decided to save up money to buy an SNES and ALttP. Once I had the money, I bought a refurbished SNES from a second hand games store. But it took weeks of calling pawn shops and game stores until I found one that had a copy of LttP.
Saving up, searching for, and finally playing through that game as a teenager is a delightful memory for me.
I don't think I can separate my nostalgia from my critical thinking on this one. The North American version is better in every way, to my eyes.
I never did, but I did write a walkthrough for it.
The early 2000s were a weird time for the Internet.
Ninja Gaiden 2 was always my favorite as a kid, though I was rarely able to beat the spider boss at the end of the third level. And I don't think I ever got very far at all in the fourth level. Fuck that shit.
Dragon Warrior was also a favorite of mine. The art on the cartridge was so evocative, and the open world exploration of the game was so new and exciting at the time. I've played DW all the way through twice as an adult (once on an emulator, and once on the cartridge when I got it.) It really is a dull, boring game. But I have a fond place in my heart for it.
Oh, and the original Castlevania is still the only Castlevania game that I like very much at all.
