Posts by Shrukan

    I got banned for flaming Squall.

    Edit:
    Lucas - Metakaiser says (6:37 PM):
    well because that's what im supposed to do?
    you should have eaten it and shut up, but you dind't meet at least that expectative
    Lucas - Metakaiser says (6:37 PM):
    i tought you were more intelligent than that
    Shrukan (F) TK (F) says (6:37 PM):
    You calling me a dumbass now?
    Shrukan (F) TK (F) says (6:37 PM):
    I don't like it when I have to deal with infractions when I feel I shouldn't need them.
    Shrukan (F) TK (F) says (6:38 PM):
    I ATE the one Soggy gave me cause I deserved it.

    It wasn', but I got infracted for it, when Squall just runs around and flames everyone in the damn universe.

    Edit:

    You have been banned for the following reason:
    Rule breaking, flamming.

    Date the ban will be lifted: November 27th, 2007, 06:00 PM

    Quote

    One question: Why don't you give infractions to Squall for spamming, eh? I get banned and shit for spamming and flaming and past admins get the slide off? Does that honestly make ****ing sense?

    I honestly have no idea why the **** they do this.

    <PK Starstorm>

    Lucas?s Final Smash is PK Starstorm! It?s a move in which he unleashes a rapid barrage of meteorlike PSI power.

    After a fierce battle, he gets the Smash Ball!

    P...K....

    STARRRRRRRRSTORRRRRRRRRM!

    As the star storm continues, the tension increases. They all rain down at once.

    Can you possibly escape it?!

    It may be that it?s less advantageous on larger stages and more advantageous on smaller ones. There are a variety of moves like this that have clear advantages and disadvantages depending on the terrain.

    DISCUSSION!

    Let's put it plain and simple:

    Your dad is half way done with his life and is just an old son-of-a-*****-of-a-father.

    Yes I deal with this too. Whenever mom says: "Are you going shopping with me?" I reply "no", then she counters with a "You are going whether you want to or not". It seems like I have no control over my life any more and mom has most of the strings in her hand.

    (Right now I can't type worth shit cause of my damn tiredness, but I'll finish it).

    Your sister is also a bit annoying with her using your computer. I mean, it is yours.

    Sorry I got nothing much to say, but I'm tired.

    The definition of "milking" is to make a game just for the sake of making it to attract customers/without constructing anything fresh or ultimately plot-advancing... something like Link's Crossbow Training is somewhat milking to an extent, because it's just TP Link with a crossbow in some mini-games, although it does utilize the Wii Zapper. Super Mario Galaxy definitely isn't milking... whoever says otherwise is an idiot. Leafgreen and Firered were just remakes of Red and Blue, which didn't add anything new to the franchise other than using the same concepts from Ruby and Sapphire, only with the "original" Pokemon.

    LCT with the Wii Zapper can be used to help start First Person Shooters in the future.

    LG and FR also had one new Pokemon: Deoxys.

    Lately, I have noticed how much people began to detest things. People hated Twilight Princess for it's surprisingly easy game play. People hate cell-shaded games. People shun Nintendo... Killzone sucked...

    Why do you think they do this? Because Nintendo is too kiddy? Because Killzone just sucked major balls?

    In actually most gamers are just a bunch of babies. As I said to Shadow Link when he "insulted" me awhile back: "All gamers are just babies. They get fed and spit up their milk when it's something they don't like. If it 'tastes bad' they spit it up."

    Some gamers think Nintendo is milking their franchise. What do you expect them to do? Make one great game, then throw away the character and make another thing outta their ass? I mean seriously. Whether Mario or Zelda games are seen, people think they are milking the same thing over and over. Do you actually noticed they change the games a bit?

    Mario Galaxy for example. Is it the same as SM64 just because Mario is in it? Hell no. We have more power ups: Ice Mario, Bee Mario, Boo Mario, and finally Luigi is in the game! Do you think this is milking the game? Galaxy was completely different than the 8-bit Mario games that were on the NES . They changed, evolved, and gave something new to gamers.

    What about Zelda? Is it the same as it was in 1986? No. Just like Mario, it evolved. There is never one of the Zelda games that was a complete remake of another in terms of storyline. Familiar characters came back, and new ones also appeared.

    How about Smash Bros? We're coming onto the third one. Is this milking an old franchise? Hell no. This too evolved for the Wii. New characters, Final Smashes, Assist trophies, and a lot to be seen. I highly doubt this being milked.

    Pokemon? Sure the anime sucks, but the games are still running by the same systems. Tweaking the game's storyline a bit assists it a bit, but other than that, it's fine.

    If you think because have multiple sequels to game is milking it, then what about Guitar Hero? How about GTA? What about Halo and Metal Gear? They all had a few sequels. Are we milking them? Tell me: are we?

    I'm just sick of all gamers who can't handle shit and say: "This game sucked major balls because it didn't have this in it." I repeat this over and over: "Deal with it, because you ain't going to get your ways all the time. Good luck sending a complaint letter about this game sucking balls, cause I'm quite sure that Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft/3rd Party will listen to one person in the middle of a small community in the slums of the United States or a remote area in the center of Europe."

    I'll end my rant here. Feel free to discuss what you feel.