Posts by TriforceMaster3000

  • Freshly Picked Tingle's Rose-Coloured Rupees And Tingle Balloon Fight

    Quote from zeypher


    its not a zelda game dude. just because it has tingle doesnt make it a zelda game. is SSB, SSBM, SSBB, and soul caliber 2 zelda game just because they have link or zelda? no. i respect you though for having the guts to play that game though.yes they are horrible, take it from my personal experience. if you want to watch the ending to the second one(wand of gamelon) then go to my website http://www.zeldadventures.1-r.us and click misc.info (under multimedia) then click worst zelda endings and watch #3 on the countdown.*catches breath*

    Um, dude, it IS a Zelda game. It is in the Zelda universe, made from the same people who make the Zelda games. It's a Zelda game, Nintendo even believes this. If you want to think differently, take it up with Nintendo. It's a Zelda game, just a spinoff. Luigi's mansion is a spinoff, not featuring Mario as the main character at all, yet it's considered part of the Mario universe.

    It is a Zelda game. And that's pretty much factual dude. You think differently, take it up with Nintendo.

  • OoT V.s TP

    Quote from zeypher


    you are very wise, happy mask salesman :)
    anyway, like happy mask salesman said, that is only limited by technology. Make OoT and TP both have the graphics of LoZ. like i said before you CAN'T judge a game on it's graphics. And as for TP's storyline, it wasn't better at all. the story wad BARELY explained in that game, it was riddiculus. and TP wasn't even hard. anyone could beat that game, even if they had never even played any other Zelda game before.i agree with that as well. way too much time is wasted traveling, i like the scenery, but its just too big, much like sailing in TWW.
    dont get me wrong, TP is a great game, but games like OoT, ALttP and MM were better. and with that i rest my case. go OoT!

    Things never change. OoT fanboyz will be OoT fanboyz. By the way, OoT was the first time I ever played or heard of Zelda, and yet I beat it in a couple weeks. TP I beat more quicker, but that's just because I'm a better gamer now than I was back in 1999. And OoT was easy, very easy, possibly the easiest 3D Zelda, only beaten in easyness by TWW of course. OoT had no challenging bosses besides the little challenge Morpha had, the Water Temple is completely easy, people who say it's hard are just the ones that played the game years ago when they were little kids and had to have their older siblings beat it for them, and they never played it again by themselves. Dark Link is incredibly easy, I've faced a lot tougher mini bosses in my time, even in the Zelda series (for the record, I can beat Dark Link without taking damage. You gotta use logic and strategy, something a lot of gamers don't have these days. Hell, I beat him without taking damage a few months ago). Ganondorf and Ganon especially was a joke. I actually thought PHantom Ganon was tougher than Ganondorf. OoT was just too easy. At least TP had harder AI(not that hard though, as usual) and some actual time consuming, mind thinking puzzles. Take the blocks in Snowpeak ruins for example(and don't anyone say that that doesn't take any thinking power at all, because if it does, you're lying to yourself).

    Actually, no. Let's face it. The Zelda series as a whole is easy, or at least the 3D ones, excluding MM. When you get down to it, just compare the 2D games on a hardness scale against the 3D games. If you have a brain, you should be able to see that the 2D games will blow away the 3D games anyday in difficulty. At least the 2D games allow you to think more for puzzles, and don't give a simple "okay, I push this switch, yay, a chest, yay, small key, unlock door, yay, more switches, and a pot to lay it down with! HOORAY!" crap. Now if you want to talk about AI overall, good luck. Look elsewhere if you want challenging and tough battles against the enemies and bosses. Zelda don't got it, sorry.

    And also, for Twilight Princess, the storyline was actually just as deep, if not deeper, than OoT. The thing is, it's not the type of game that tells you more and more every cutscene. It drops hint along the way, pieces of the story in code, and you gotta figure them out, piece them together, and there you go. Another reason why TP is unique. OoT, it just flat out told you the whole storyline by the time you turned an adult, and that's not even midway through the game. It also retold the same story of the Goddesses and the Triforce multiple times, with only a couple new small things here and there. I don't want the whole story to be told to me not even halfway through, and then be playing the other 2/3 of the game without a story. That is boring, no matter which way you look at it.

    By the way, technology only applies to graphics. A game with the graphics of LoZ can have a great storyline, can be pretty challenging(hell, the first LoZ has to be one of the toughest games), and emotion does not mean facial expressions. Emotion in a game means character personality, emotion in a story, dramatic tension, etc. Any game can have that fine, no matter what the tech or graphics.

    And by the way, when you compare them, OoT had just as much traveling as TP. Just wasn't as big. Hell, all Zelda games have big parts in traveling. It's not a "play level, beat level, new level, play level" thing. No. It's an Adventure game, and Adventures have traveling. If you don't want a lot of traveling, don't play a big Adventure game like Zelda.

    And with THAT, I rest my case. :)

  • The Official Super Smash Bros Brawl Thread

    That's not the point.

    Nintendo and Sega themselves said that Olympics would be the first game ever to have both Mario & Sonic in a game together. If they put him in Brawl, that won't stand. THAT'S why I'm doubting it.

    I have a better feeling that Nintendo will put a stupid 3rd party character that doesn't belong (similiar to Snake) in the game rather than Sonic, who does belong...

  • The Legend of Zelda: The Minish Cap

    Quote from zeypher


    it was way too short i beat it in two hours :)
    its still pretty fun though, i should go buy it again...

    There is no way it's beatable in two hours, I'll let you know that right there. You must be over exagerrating. The game is short, probably maybe 8-10 hours, if not somewhat less. Not 2 hours though, no way.

  • Best Console

    Just for the record, I know PS3 and 360 have better graphics than the Wii, but if anyone takes a console over another just for its graphics and nothing more, you are, for lack of a better term, and idiot. Just saying. I'm not directing this at anyone who has posted here. I just wanted to get that out. It annoys me all the time because the kids at my school always put down the Wii for the 360 and PS3 because the Wii doesn't have as good of graphical power as the other two. Because of that, they take down everything about the Wii, by saying its design is dumb, controller is stupid, etc. Although I can bet that if a PS3 looked like a Wii and had the same tech as a Wii, they'd love it. I just gotta get this off my chest, it annoys me all the time.

Zelda Community is not affiliated with Nintendo®.
Copyright © 2000-2024, Zelda Cavern.
All Rights Reserved.