Just lighten up Shrukan. Maybe take a small break from the forum. It's better than just staying here and having to stress yourself around everybody. Like LOTT and Mav said, Vbulletin is just a software that runs the forum. It may be a bit better than most, but it's not the best to me. Just lighten up.
Posts by Kenpari
-
-
I really don't want to see you go Shrukan. People here do care about you and Zelda Temple, no matter what you may think. I would advise just not being so harsh all the time. Please don't be this way. There are actually hosts I like better than Vbulletin.
You may have brought back Zelda Temple forums, but they were still a new forum none-the-less. The others are no longer here. Parts of it are fused with this place. So really the ZT forums that you remade are actually a sort of new forum, and after the transfer and merge people kind of got attached to this place.
-
Shrukan, this is what, the fifth time you've done this? It's just your attitude towards others. Try and lighten up a bit, and who ever said we all praise LOTT for having Vbulletin? New forums don't usually grow right away. Most don't even start to prosper at all. It's just the way things are. You don't have to be like this. Just try and calm down.
-
People, don't listen to the attractive image! Kenpari has experience on 6 Vbulletin forums, moderates on a total of 11, knows how to settle an argument, can help calm others down, knows the Mod CP of Vbulletin inside and out, is loyal to all forums he moderates, and is bound to this place due to his New Years Resolutions!
-
I'm not saying I know. Read the first post in the thread. "As far as people liking it" I know a majority of people who like it. It's not about one opinion, but opinions combined. I'm saying it is possibly the greatest as far as the amount of people liking it.
-
A rather hawt image. >_> You still won't get my vote!
-
It also had a great influence on me. If I would have played Majora's Mask as my first Zelda game I probably wouldn't have bought any of the others.
-
^ There's another one. You can check it out at some other forums and I bet the majority think that OoT's the best.
-
You might want to support that with some details there, Cap'n.
-
For one thing, the good gameplay portion is pure opinion. When was the last time you saw a game that was really violent with having no good gameplay at all? God of War? Incorrect. God of War was actually considered, by many, one of the best games of the year for its gameplay, besides the violence involved. GTA? Even more incorrect. Like GoW, it was considered one of the best Action games because of its gameplay and unmatched open-endedness, besides the violence. Besides, it has some of the worst graphics out of any of the last generation games. Is that saying anything to you?
The graphics aren't everything. Most people don't really care about the graphics. To most people, gameplay is the larger factor. I wouldn't want to play a game with graphics that you couldn't tell what anything is, but you don't see any games like that. As long as the gameplay is good, it's fine by me.
I can't think of any other violent games like these right now, but my point remains. If you're going to accuse the game companies of making crappy games with lots of violence... actually, just don't, because it's false.
A lot of people thought highly of Assassin's Creed. It had a lot of violence. Then again any game with the word assassin in it I would expect to be violent unless it's a cartoon-ish sort of game. There was a lot of blood and fighting in Assassin's Creed. Hell, if you bump into a guard a big fight starts and theres bloodshed everywhere.
I don't understand the "Sony fanboy/girl" or "Microsoft fanboy/girl" accusations against people who only have those systems. You're attacking someone for having a console that hardly has any of the respective company's games on there... which is silly.
I find it stupid to attack somebody for just having a certain console. It has even been done to me before.
Graphics are important these days. You can disagree with me all you want, but they do make a difference. I'm not saying they're the only thing that's important, but a game with good renders and a smooth framerate is more enjoyable than a game that is lacking aforementioned things.
Yes, they do make a difference, but aren't everything. As stated earlier, I wouldn't want to play a game with horrible graphics in which case you can't even tell one thing from another. They make a big difference.
-
Alttp was my 2nd favorite Zelda game. I just didn't understand the storyline most of the time and some other things. The two witches in the Spirit Temple(starts with and K) were actually sort of difficult if you ask me. I never was good at moving the camera. The Water Temple boss when I sometimes forget the strategy gets awfully damn close to beating me. The Phantom Hourglass bosses were pathetic to me.
-
It makes it a bit too much of a hassle for me. I know people who don't like going through that extra hassle(lazy =P). And I suppose you could turn it around and say pointless playing OoT over and over, but I don't think the storyline is boring. No matter how many times I play it, I have trouble. I would like it if the bosses in Phantom Hourglass could actually defeat me. I still get beat by bosses in OoT. In Phantom Hourglass the strategies were a bit too predictable for me.
-
I also wondered why you would want to collect the ship parts. If you want to finish the game 100% then it's fine, but otherwise pretty pointless. I beat the game with only the necessary ship parts. Sure the OoT storyline may start to get boring after a while, but so does Phantom Hourglass's storyline to me.
I also didn't like the way you switched items on Phantom Hourglass. If I remember the enemies still moved when switching items(may be wrong). There may have been a bit more puzzles, but the Water Temple sums that up for you.
-
I thought Phantom Hourglass was far too short and easy for me. Also for me it's not that kind of game that you go back and try and beat again. I have beaten OoT numerous times and it never gets old for me. I always end up forgetting something along the way. Phantom Hourglass was a bit too predictable and too easy to remember everything when playing it a second time through. As I said, I go to many forums, and the majority of them like OoT the best.
-
Once again, don't give me that bull about reviving threads. It's not worthless. I think CC was about the only one who did got on people for that though.
Anyway, I just recently got Firefox. An awesome browser it is. I was used to MSN Explorer before I got Firefox. MSN never had tabbing, so that sucked. I used an older version of Internet Explorer as well. It didn't do the tabbing. I now have Internet Explorer 7 with the tabbing. Firefox is still better though. It blocks popups very well too. I already had popup blocker though. =P
Either way, I still think Firefox is better. Not to mention it can block the images from certain places, which removes those ads of images you always see.
-
I watch South Park occasionally. Very funny show.
Oh and don't give me that bull about no reviving threads. This thread is still good.
-
Lol, I thought Shiek was a male for a long time. Until Super Smash Brothers Melee. Shiek is Zelda, so I'm pretty sure Shiek is a female. As Muigi stated. There was a real Shiek at one time. Their race was known as the Shiekah(directly from OoT).
-
Now, I know a lot of you probably like OoT as well. I'm thinking. Is OoT the best Zelda game as far as people liking it?
I have been to a lot of forums and the majority of the favorite Zelda games have been OoT. I, personally, think OoT was the best Zelda game. It was not only my first Zelda game, but my first game. I loved the storyline. It wasn't too short or too long. It wasn't too hard or too easy either.
-
I always use the switch targeting. It find it much better and easier.
-
I still think Silver is shinier than gold....
Copyright © 2000-2025, Zelda Cavern.
All Rights Reserved.